STRATEGY & SCENARIO ADVISORY
Plan for more than one future.
Most AI strategies are built for a single assumed future. We stress-test yours against multiple plausible scenarios, so your leadership team can make the decisions that hold across more than one outcome.
Most AI strategies are built for a single assumed future. We stress-test yours against multiple plausible scenarios, so your leadership team can defend their
decisions, not just explain them.
Georgetown AI Scenarios | AIGP (IAPP) | 25 Years Org Design
Where We Work
Before the decisions get locked in.
Before the decisions get locked in.
Meninge engages before implementation begins. Before the vendor is selected. Before the
business case gets presented to the board. That is where the decisions with the longest
consequences live.
Strategy consulting firms hand you a deck. Meninge installs a living scenario portfolio your leadership team continues to use. The scenarios get refined as conditions change. The work stays useful.
Strategy consulting firms hand you a deck. Meninge installs a living scenario portfolio your leadership team continues to use. The scenarios get refined as conditions change. The work stays
useful.
Project planning keeps you from building badly. Strategy keeps you from building blindly.
The Methodology
From prediction to preparedness.
From prediction to preparedness.
Scenarios are not forecasts. They do not tell you what will happen. They tell you what your organisation is prepared for, and where the gaps are. That shift, from prediction to preparedness, is what separates this work from roadmap-and-hope consulting.
Scenarios are not forecasts. They do not tell you what will happen. They tell you what your organisation is prepared for, and where the gaps are. That shift — from prediction to preparedness
— is what separates this work from roadmap-and-hope consulting.
Scenarios are not forecasts. They do not tell you what will happen. They tell you what your organisation is prepared for, and where the gaps are. That shift — from prediction to preparedness — is what separates this work from roadmap-and-hope consulting.
Every engagement uses a structured methodology grounded in Georgetown AI Scenarios training. We build 3 scenario types: Baseline (the plausible continuation), Wildcard (high-impact, low-probability), and Normative (the preferred future, worked backwardsfrom). Each scenario passes a 4-dimension evaluation: plausibility, probability, measurability, and divergence.
Every engagement uses a structured methodology grounded in Georgetown AI Scenarios training. The result is a set of tested strategic positions your leadership team can use, not a one-time
deliverable that gets filed away.
Every engagement uses a structured methodology grounded in Georgetown AI Scenarios training. The result is a set of tested strategic positions your leadership team can use, not a one-time deliverable that gets filed away.
The result is a set of tested strategic positions your leadership team can use, not a one-time deliverable that gets filed away.
Every engagement uses a structured methodology grounded in Georgetown AI Scenarios training. The result is a set of tested strategic positions your leadership team can use, not a one-time
deliverable that gets filed away.
Every engagement uses a structured methodology grounded in Georgetown AI Scenarios training. The result is a set of tested strategic positions your leadership team can use, not a one-time deliverable that gets filed away.
Engagements
Named, scoped, with a deliverable
your board can evaluate.
Named, scoped, with a deliverable
your board can evaluate.
Each service has a fixed scope, a fixed timeline, and a clear output. Work begins after a signed agreement and deposit.
Start Here
00
90-Min AI Pressure Test
90 minutes + 48-hour summary
From $4,000 CAD
* Full fee credited to a signed engagement
For: CEO, COO, Chief Strategy Officer, General Counsel. Leadership teams of 3 to 8
Most leadership teams have never had to defend their AI direction out loud, in real time, to someone whose job is to find where it breaks. This session does that. Martin runs your team through 2 to 3 scenarios built for your industry and the AI decisions currently on your desk, then names the assumptions your direction depends on. No preparation required from your team. You receive a written summary within 48 hours telling you where the strategy holds, where it breaks, and whether what you have is a strategy gap, a governance gap, or both.
What you walk away with
→
2 to 3 scenarios built for your industry and your pending AI decisions
→
Assumptions map: what is pulling your AI direction, what is pushing it, what is holding it back
→
Blind Spot Summary, 2 to 4 pages, delivered within 48 hours
→
Named blind spots with the strategic and governance risk attached to each
→
Confidence rating from your team before and after the session
→
Recommended next step with specific options
00
90-Min AI Pressure Test
90 minutes + 48-hour summary
From $4,000 CAD
* Full fee credited to a signed engagement
For: CEO, COO, Chief Strategy Officer, General Counsel. Leadership teams of 3 to 8
Most leadership teams have never had to defend their AI direction out loud, in real time, to someone whose job is to find where it breaks. This session does that. Martin runs your team through 2 to 3 scenarios built for your industry and the AI decisions currently on your desk, then names the assumptions your direction depends on. No preparation required from your team. You receive a written summary within 48 hours telling you where the strategy holds, where it breaks, and whether what you have is a strategy gap, a governance gap, or both.
What you walk away with
→
2 to 3 scenarios built for your industry and your pending AI decisions
→
Assumptions map: what is pulling your AI direction, what is pushing it, what is holding it back
→
Blind Spot Summary, 2 to 4 pages, delivered within 48 hours
→
Named blind spots with the strategic and governance risk attached to each
→
Confidence rating from your team before and after the session
→
Recommended next step with specific options
00·S
90-Min AI Pressure Test, Solo
90 minutes + 48-hour summary
From $2,500 CAD
* Full fee credited to a signed engagement
For: CEO, COO, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer. Sole AI decision-makers.
You own the AI decision and there is nobody in the room to disagree with you. That is the problem. The group format runs on cross-functional tension, so when the tension is not available the pressure has to come from somewhere else. Martin reads your questionnaire before the session and arrives with 3 specific observations about your direction, then applies 2 scenarios directly to your decision logic and challenges your answers as you give them. You receive the same written summary within 48 hours telling you where your direction holds, where it breaks, and whether what you have is a strategy gap, a governance gap, or both.
What you walk away with
→
2 scenarios built for your industry and the AI decision currently on your desk
→
3 pre-loaded observations about your direction, prepared before you arrive
→
Assumptions map: what is pulling your AI direction, what is pushing it, what is holding it back
→
Blind Spot Summary, 2 to 4 pages, delivered within 48 hours
→
Named blind spots with the strategic and governance risk attached to each
→
Confidence rating before and after the session
→
Recommended next step with specific options
Leading a team of 3 to 8? The group format runs 2 to 3 scenarios and uses cross-functional disagreement as the pressure source.
00·S
90-Min AI Pressure Test, Solo
90 minutes + 48-hour summary
From $2,500 CAD
* Full fee credited to a signed engagement
For: CEO, COO, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer. Sole AI decision-makers.
You own the AI decision and there is nobody in the room to disagree with you. That is the problem. The group format runs on cross-functional tension, so when the tension is not available the pressure has to come from somewhere else. Martin reads your questionnaire before the session and arrives with 3 specific observations about your direction, then applies 2 scenarios directly to your decision logic and challenges your answers as you give them. You receive the same written summary within 48 hours telling you where your direction holds, where it breaks, and whether what you have is a strategy gap, a governance gap, or both.
What you walk away with
→
2 scenarios built for your industry and the AI decision currently on your desk
→
3 pre-loaded observations about your direction, prepared before you arrive
→
Assumptions map: what is pulling your AI direction, what is pushing it, what is holding it back
→
Blind Spot Summary, 2 to 4 pages, delivered within 48 hours
→
Named blind spots with the strategic and governance risk attached to each
→
Confidence rating before and after the session
→
Recommended next step with specific options
Leading a team of 3 to 8? The group format runs 2 to 3 scenarios and uses cross-functional disagreement as the pressure source.
One Decision
01
Decision Wind-Tunnelling as a Service
1–2 weeks
For: CEO, CTO, VP Engineering — time-sensitive AI decisions
You have one AI decision on the table with a real number attached and a date it has to be made by. The analysis behind it assumes one version of the next 18 months. We take that decision, run it through 2 to 3 plausible futures, and identify the specific conditions under which it holds and the ones that break it. You get a written go/no-go with the assumptions named, in time to still change the decision.
What you walk away with
→
Rapid scenario analysis for one strategic decision
→
Wind-tunnel report: performance across 2–3 futures
→
Key assumption identification and vulnerability assessment
→
Go/no-go recommendation with conditions and contingencies
→
One-page executive summary for decision documentation
01
Decision Wind-Tunnelling as a Service
1–2 weeks
For: CEO, CTO, VP Engineering — time-sensitive AI decisions
You have one AI decision on the table with a real number attached and a date it has to be made by. The analysis behind it assumes one version of the next 18 months. We take that decision, run it through 2 to 3 plausible futures, and identify the specific conditions under which it holds and the ones that break it. You get a written go/no-go with the assumptions named, in time to still change the decision.
What you walk away with
→
Rapid scenario analysis for one strategic decision
→
Wind-tunnel report: performance across 2–3 futures
→
Key assumption identification and vulnerability assessment
→
Go/no-go recommendation with conditions and contingencies
→
One-page executive summary for decision documentation
One Session
02
AI Crisis Scenario Simulation
2–3 weeks prep + half-day
For: CEO, COO, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, CHRO
Most leadership teams have never rehearsed an AI failure. The first time they work out who calls the regulator, who talks to the customer, and who has the authority to shut the system off is while it is happening. We build 3 to 4 AI crisis scenarios specific to your industry and your tool inventory, run your team through them live, and document where the decisions stalled and why.
What you walk away with
→
3–4 tailored AI crisis scenarios
→
Facilitated half-day simulation exercise
→
Real-time decision tracking
→
After-action analysis with gap identification
→
Stakeholder communication plan template
→
Crisis response protocol recommendations
→
Escalation pathway and ownership matrix
02
AI Crisis Scenario Simulation
2–3 weeks prep + half-day
For: CEO, COO, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, CHRO
Most leadership teams have never rehearsed an AI failure. The first time they work out who calls the regulator, who talks to the customer, and who has the authority to shut the system off is while it is happening. We build 3 to 4 AI crisis scenarios specific to your industry and your tool inventory, run your team through them live, and document where the decisions stalled and why.
What you walk away with
→
3–4 tailored AI crisis scenarios
→
Facilitated half-day simulation exercise
→
Real-time decision tracking
→
After-action analysis with gap identification
→
Stakeholder communication plan template
→
Crisis response protocol recommendations
→
Escalation pathway and ownership matrix
03
AI-Enhanced Scenario Workshop
1–2 week prep + half/full day
For: CEO, CTO, Chief Strategy Officer —leadership teams, strategic planning offsites
Your leadership team already disagrees about AI. The disagreement usually stays unspoken because there is no setting where it has to be resolved. A half-day or full-day session puts 2 to 3 developed scenarios in front of the team and makes them work through what each one does to the current roadmap. The entry point for teams new to scenario work.
What you walk away with
→
2–3 fully developed scenarios for your industry and competitive position
→
Scenario assessment matrix with plausibility and strategic relevance ratings
→
Live demonstration of the scenario generation methodology
→
Strategic implication mapping for your current AI roadmap
→
Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on
→
Visual scenario narratives for board or leadership communication
→
Post-workshop brief with recommended next steps
03
AI-Enhanced Scenario Workshop
1–2 week prep + half/full day
For: CEO, CTO, Chief Strategy Officer —leadership teams, strategic planning offsites
Your leadership team already disagrees about AI. The disagreement usually stays unspoken because there is no setting where it has to be resolved. A half-day or full-day session puts 2 to 3 developed scenarios in front of the team and makes them work through what each one does to the current roadmap. The entry point for teams new to scenario work.
What you walk away with
→
2–3 fully developed scenarios for your industry and competitive position
→
Scenario assessment matrix with plausibility and strategic relevance ratings
→
Live demonstration of the scenario generation methodology
→
Strategic implication mapping for your current AI roadmap
→
Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on
→
Visual scenario narratives for board or leadership communication
→
Post-workshop brief with recommended next steps
Full Engagement
04
AI Strategy Stress-Test & Scenario Portfolio Installation
4–6 weeks
For: CEO, COO, Chief Strategy Officer, Board AI Committee
Your AI strategy rests on assumptions about regulation, vendor behaviour, competitor moves, and what the technology costs 2 years out. Some of those assumptions are wrong. This engagement finds which ones your strategy cannot survive losing. We stress-test the roadmap against 3 structured scenarios, map how a failure at one decision point moves through the rest of the organisation, and install a scenario portfolio your team keeps using after the engagement ends.
What you walk away with
→
Scenario portfolio: Baseline, Wildcard, and Normative scenarios tailored to your industry
→
Strategic blind spot analysis with gap prioritisation
→
System-level risk map showing how decisions cascade across actors and functions
→
Governance gap summary feeding into Pillar Two (if relevant)
→
Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on
→
Board-ready executive briefing
→
Portfolio installation session with your leadership team
04
AI Strategy Stress-Test & Scenario Portfolio Installation
4–6 weeks
For: CEO, COO, Chief Strategy Officer, Board AI Committee
Your AI strategy rests on assumptions about regulation, vendor behaviour, competitor moves, and what the technology costs 2 years out. Some of those assumptions are wrong. This engagement finds which ones your strategy cannot survive losing. We stress-test the roadmap against 3 structured scenarios, map how a failure at one decision point moves through the rest of the organisation, and install a scenario portfolio your team keeps using after the engagement ends.
What you walk away with
→
Scenario portfolio: Baseline, Wildcard, and Normative scenarios tailored to your industry
→
Strategic blind spot analysis with gap prioritisation
→
System-level risk map showing how decisions cascade across actors and functions
→
Governance gap summary feeding into Pillar Two (if relevant)
→
Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on
→
Board-ready executive briefing
→
Portfolio installation session with your leadership team
05
AI Disruption Readiness Assessment
3–5 weeks
For: CEO, COO, CHRO, Board
Disruption in your industry will not announce itself as disruption. It shows up as a competitor pricing 40% below you, or a client asking why your process still takes 3 weeks. This assessment tests how exposed your competitive position, workforce plan, and business model are across a set of AI-driven disruption scenarios, and tells you which ones you could absorb and which would require a different company.
What you walk away with
→
Industry-specific disruption scenario set
→
Competitive exposure analysis across scenario futures
→
Workforce and business model vulnerability map
→
Prioritised readiness gap report
→
Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on
→
Strategic recommendations with scenario-tested options
→
Board-ready summary
05
AI Disruption Readiness Assessment
3–5 weeks
For: CEO, COO, CHRO, Board
Disruption in your industry will not announce itself as disruption. It shows up as a competitor pricing 40% below you, or a client asking why your process still takes 3 weeks. This assessment tests how exposed your competitive position, workforce plan, and business model are across a set of AI-driven disruption scenarios, and tells you which ones you could absorb and which would require a different company.
What you walk away with
→
Industry-specific disruption scenario set
→
Competitive exposure analysis across scenario futures
→
Workforce and business model vulnerability map
→
Prioritised readiness gap report
→
Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on
→
Strategic recommendations with scenario-tested options
→
Board-ready summary
06
Executive Decision Framework with Wind-Tunnelling
3–5 weeks
For: CEO, CTO, Chief Strategy Officer
AI decisions arrive faster than the process for evaluating them, so most get approved on the strength of whoever presented them best. This engagement builds the evaluation standard your organisation applies to every AI decision, wind-tunnels 2 to 3 of your current ones through it, and leaves the framework with your team so the next decision does not depend on who is in the room.
What you walk away with
→
Custom AI decision evaluation framework for your organisation
→
Wind-tunnel analysis of 2–3 current strategic decisions
→
RACI structure for AI decision ownership
→
Decision documentation templates
→
Leadership facilitation guide for ongoing use
06
Executive Decision Framework with Wind-Tunnelling
3–5 weeks
For: CEO, CTO, Chief Strategy Officer
AI decisions arrive faster than the process for evaluating them, so most get approved on the strength of whoever presented them best. This engagement builds the evaluation standard your organisation applies to every AI decision, wind-tunnels 2 to 3 of your current ones through it, and leaves the framework with your team so the next decision does not depend on who is in the room.
What you walk away with
→
Custom AI decision evaluation framework for your organisation
→
Wind-tunnel analysis of 2–3 current strategic decisions
→
RACI structure for AI decision ownership
→
Decision documentation templates
→
Leadership facilitation guide for ongoing use
07
AI Portfolio Risk Analysis
2–4 weeks
For: CTO, VP Engineering, Chief Risk Officer
With 5 or more AI tools in production, each one was assessed alone. The risk that matters sits between them: a model feeding another model, 3 tools depending on the same vendor, a failure at one point that nobody traced downstream. We inventory the full portfolio, score risk at the component and aggregate level, and identify the compounding failure modes.
What you walk away with
→
Complete AI portfolio inventory and dependency map
→
Portfolio risk map with individual and aggregate risk scores
→
Vendor concentration and dependency chain analysis
→
Scenario-based vulnerability assessment per component
→
Portfolio installation session with your leadership team
→
Compounding failure mode identification
07
AI Portfolio Risk Analysis
2–4 weeks
For: CTO, VP Engineering, Chief Risk Officer
With 5 or more AI tools in production, each one was assessed alone. The risk that matters sits between them: a model feeding another model, 3 tools depending on the same vendor, a failure at one point that nobody traced downstream. We inventory the full portfolio, score risk at the component and aggregate level, and identify the compounding failure modes.
What you walk away with
→
Complete AI portfolio inventory and dependency map
→
Portfolio risk map with individual and aggregate risk scores
→
Vendor concentration and dependency chain analysis
→
Scenario-based vulnerability assessment per component
→
Portfolio installation session with your leadership team
→
Compounding failure mode identification
Ongoing
08
Strategic Scenario Retainer
6-month minimum
Retainer
For: CEO, COO, Chief Strategy Officer — post-portfolio installation
A scenario portfolio built in March describes March. Regulation moves, vendors change terms, competitors do something nobody modelled. This retainer keeps the portfolio current: quarterly refresh against new evidence, monthly check-ins on what has shifted, and on-demand wind-tunnelling when a decision cannot wait for the next quarter.
What you walk away with
→
Quarterly scenario portfolio refresh with iterative refinement
→
Monthly executive check-in against the portfolio
→
On-demand wind-tunnelling for time-sensitive decisions (up to 2 per month)
→
Annual comprehensive portfolio review
→
Continuous governance gap flagging feeding into Pillar Two
08
Strategic Scenario Retainer
6-month minimum
Retainer
For: CEO, COO, Chief Strategy Officer — post-portfolio installation
A scenario portfolio built in March describes March. Regulation moves, vendors change terms, competitors do something nobody modelled. This retainer keeps the portfolio current: quarterly refresh against new evidence, monthly check-ins on what has shifted, and on-demand wind-tunnelling when a decision cannot wait for the next quarter.
What you walk away with
→
Quarterly scenario portfolio refresh with iterative refinement
→
Monthly executive check-in against the portfolio
→
On-demand wind-tunnelling for time-sensitive decisions (up to 2 per month)
→
Annual comprehensive portfolio review
→
Continuous governance gap flagging feeding into Pillar Two
* The full Pressure Test fee is credited against any Meninge engagement signed within 30 days of your Blind Spot Summary. One credit per organisation. The credit does not apply to a second Pressure Test.
Strategy and Governance Together
Strategy tells you what to build. Governance tells you who answers for it.
Strategy tells you what to build. Governance tells you who answers for it.
Every scenario engagement surfaces governance questions. When you stress-test an AI investment against 3 futures, you find out which oversight structures hold in only one of them. When you wind-tunnel a deployment decision, the question of who owns the output arrives before the tool does.
The Pressure Test is a half-day diagnostic session. Martin walks your leadership team through 2–3 industry-relevant scenarios to surface strategic blind spots.
No preparation required. You receive a written diagnostic summary within 48 hours.
A scenario portfolio tells you what your organisation should be prepared for. Governance decides who is accountable when the moment arrives. Meninge’s two-pillar structure means the same person carries both, and findings from one become inputs to the other.
It shows you where your AI strategy breaks under pressure, whether you have a strategy gap, a governance gap, or both, and which engagement makes sense next. Most clients move from the Pressure Test to a full strategy engagement. Some move to governance. The diagnostic tells you which.
Credentials
Every service traces to a specific credential.
Every service traces to a specific credential.
Not claimed experience. Verified training. Each pillar of Meninge's work
is anchored in a formal qualification.
Not claimed experience. Verified training. Each pillar of Meninge's work is anchored in a formal qualification.
01 — STRATEGY
Georgetown AI Scenarios
Georgetown University · April 2026
Scenario design, stress-testing, and strategic preparedness methodology. The foundational credential for Meninge's scenario advisory practice. Scenario typology, structured prompt methodology, and 4-dimension evaluation across plausibility, probability, measurability, and divergence.
02 — GOVERNANCE
AIGP (IAPP)
IAPP · AI Governance Professional
AI Governance Professional certification covering NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and cross-jurisdictional regulatory frameworks.
03 — ORGANISATIONAL
25 years of Human Resources and Organizational Design
Canada · United States · Europe · Asia
Human Resources and Technical and executive recruitment across organisations in Canada, the United States, Europe, and Asia building the organisational intuition behind every engagement.
How We Engage
Fixed scope. Senior-led. Upstream
only.
Fixed scope. Senior-led. Upstream
only.
Senior-Led
Martin is on every call, in every session, writing every
deliverable. No junior handoff. The person with the
credentials does the work.
Fixed Scope
Every engagement has a named scope, a timeline, and a
deliverable. Work does not expand without a signed scope
change. You know what you are buying before you sign.
Upstream Only
Meninge does not do implementation, change management,
software selection, or training rollouts. Those belong to
capable partners. Our role ends where execution begins, and
that is deliberate.
How to Start
Discovery Call (30 minutes) to confirm fit. Then either a 90-
Min Pressure Test or a direct engagement, depending on
where you are. Signed MSA and deposit before any work
begins.
Most firms give you a report. Meninge gives you a position you can defend.
30 minutes, on the record, no obligation. We'll tell you whether we're the right fit before you spend a dollar.
AI strategy and governance for mid-market organisations.
Ottawa, serving Canada and the United States.
© 2026 Meninge. All rights reserved
AI strategy and governance for mid-market organisations.
Ottawa, serving Canada and the United States.
© 2026 Meninge. All rights reserved